>I think the two leafs are coupled through the path statement and so the >values of both should conform to the same type. If I extend BalazsĀ¹ >example with uint8 and 1..10 range: > >1. Would a leafref value of 256 be acceptable? > >2. How about "foo"? I agree it doesn't makes sense, but is the configuration invalid? The leafref is marked require-instance=false, it just means a matching condition will never succeed. Would a configuration be invalid if a "when" expression could never evaluate to true? Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and require-instance=false Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and require-insta... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and require-i... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and requi... Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and requi... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and r... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref ... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leaf... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: ... Martin Bjorklund