On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote: > > > >>I think the two leafs are coupled through the path statement and so the >>values of both should conform to the same type. If I extend Balazs¹ >>example with uint8 and 1..10 range: >> >>1. Would a leafref value of 256 be acceptable? >> >>2. How about "foo"? > > > I agree it doesn't makes sense, but is the configuration invalid? > > The leafref is marked require-instance=false, it just means a matching > condition will never succeed. >
If require-instance = false then the node must conform to the data type for the leaf. This means the typedef used in the implemented version. > Would a configuration be invalid if a "when" expression could never > evaluate to true? > The node would never appear in a configuration. A must-stmt then is always false would make the config invalid. > > Kent > Andy > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
