Juergen, As another non-author, I disagree with this characterization of the draft. The intended/applied configuration is an important requirement but certainly not the only one precisely articulated in the draft.
Acee On 1/5/16, 3:02 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: >On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:29:54PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> This update addresses comments received during the Last Call. >> > >I not entirely happy with the new title: > > Terminology and Requirements for Enhanced > Operational State Visibility and Control > >Since the key contribution is the concept of intended configuration >and applied configuration, why not put these terms into the title >instead of "Enhanced Operational State Visibility and Control", which >is somewhat vague? What about this proposal: > > Terminology and Requirements for Distinguishing > Intended and Applied Configuration > >/js > >-- >Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany >Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >netmod@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
