On 1/7/16, 12:24 PM, "Robert Wilton" <rwil...@cisco.com> wrote: >I don't have a particular problem with the current title, but if you >don't like visibility/control, then perhaps "Terminology and >Requirements for Enhanced Handling of Operational State"? This looks good to me. If no objections are raised by tomorrow, I’ll post -03 using this title. Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-... internet-drafts
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-opst... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-net... Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: d... Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] I-D Actio... Juergen Schoenwaelder