[As a contributor] From Benoit:
Yes, I've seen those RFCs. The IETF is not really consistent regarding RFC 2119 and requirement documents. So I wanted to put the issue on the table. No strong view on way or the other. [Kent] thanks. Changing the MAY keywords the way you proposed is one solution, [Kent] okay, I will do that. but more importantly, you should tell us what is intent behind a MAY sentence is. So it means that the specified solution MAY or MAY not have this functionality, right? [Kent] yes, that is how I am interpreting it So what is the requirement? Maybe it's not a requirement, but just something to think about. [Kent] just something to think about I guess. But I will change the two MAY instances in the draft, so we don’t need to worry about it anymore ;) Thanks, Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod