Hi, I have a general comment, related to Benoit's request to get YANG modules done.
Augment is your friend. Use it. YANG 1.1 even allows conditionally mandatory nodes to be added, so there are no excuses for not publishing base modules that can be augmented later. IMO, adding new features in WGLC should not even be considered. Andy On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > If you could just point out the general features you are using in your > configs that are not present in the base model. I know you mentioned TCP > options matching. With respect to the augmentations, they don’t have to be > vendor specific. Some advanced ACL functions such as conditional ACLs could > be provided in standard model augmentations in future modules. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: David Bannister <d...@netflix.com> > Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM > To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com> > Cc: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net>, Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com>, Dean > Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 > (until Oct 27, 2016) > > I'm open to the idea given ample time. > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> From: David Bannister <d...@netflix.com> >> Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM >> To: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> >> Cc: Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com>, Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, Dean >> Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 >> (until Oct 27, 2016) >> >> Here are my issues with the ACL draft as it stands today from a high >> level, vs. calling out every missing field. >> >> >> Although I’m not an author of this YANG model, I’m the author of others >> and I can say from experience that it would be infinitely more productive >> for you to list the specific fields and corresponding use cases as opposed >> to a subjective high-level critique. That way, these can be incorporated >> or, at least, we can have the discussion as whether or not they belong in >> the base model. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
