As draft author, the model was designed to be easily augmented for matches and actions, so that each vendor and user can adapt it to their needs.
Dean > On Nov 23, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a general comment, related to Benoit's request to get YANG modules > done. > > Augment is your friend. Use it. > YANG 1.1 even allows conditionally mandatory nodes to be added, so there are > no excuses for not publishing base modules that can be augmented later. > > IMO, adding new features in WGLC should not even be considered. > > > Andy > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com > <mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote: > If you could just point out the general features you are using in your > configs that are not present in the base model. I know you mentioned TCP > options matching. With respect to the augmentations, they don’t have to be > vendor specific. Some advanced ACL functions such as conditional ACLs could > be provided in standard model augmentations in future modules. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: David Bannister <d...@netflix.com <mailto:d...@netflix.com>> > Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM > To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com>> > Cc: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net <mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>>, Eliot > Lear <l...@cisco.com <mailto:l...@cisco.com>>, Dean Bogdanovic > <ivand...@gmail.com <mailto:ivand...@gmail.com>>, "netmod@ietf.org > <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until > Oct 27, 2016) > > I'm open to the idea given ample time. > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com > <mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote: > Hi David, > > From: David Bannister <d...@netflix.com <mailto:d...@netflix.com>> > Date: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM > To: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net <mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>> > Cc: Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com <mailto:l...@cisco.com>>, Acee Lindem > <a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, Dean Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com > <mailto:ivand...@gmail.com>>, "netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" > <netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until > Oct 27, 2016) > > Here are my issues with the ACL draft as it stands today from a high level, > vs. calling out every missing field. > > Although I’m not an author of this YANG model, I’m the author of others and I > can say from experience that it would be infinitely more productive for you > to list the specific fields and corresponding use cases as opposed to a > subjective high-level critique. That way, these can be incorporated or, at > least, we can have the discussion as whether or not they belong in the base > model. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod> > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
