On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:18:43PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:58:18PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status > > > Standards Track. I think I heard during the meeting today that it > > > ought to be Informational. I think this makes sense. It would then > > > imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram > > > document as an informative reference. > > > > > > Should we make this change? > > > > > > > Makes sense to me. I could ask what you will do with the RFC 2119 > > language in the ID but hey I do not ask these questions anymore. ;-) > > Hmm, there is no 2119 language in this draft, so it should be ok. >
Good that I did not ask. :) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
