> So do you believe that this decision reflects rough consensus > in the WG?
Not currently, as there are two vocal groups with opposing viewpoints. However, there was strong for advancing it before. The chairs had to make a decision and, as you can imagine, it wasn't easy. Ultimately, to use a colloquialism, a bird in hand is better than two in the bush. > I hope that the document writeup will show that the WG is > divided on this issue. It will and, undoubtedly, the IETF Last Call will be an interesting one. > This new draft would immediately obsolete the current SM document, > right? And it would mark the current SM YANG nodes as deprecated. A WG decision, but seems reasonable. Are there any small things that can be done to the current model to facilitate this? > Maybe we can send both the original document and the bis document > to the IESG at the same time ;-) This would be fabulous. Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
