On 01/23/2018 03:26 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address >> unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have been made, which >> needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and >> an alternate representation of inline schema. These have been considered >> respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the position of >> the chairs that it is best to advance the existing schema-mount document at >> this time. >> > > If we take the formal road, then you may want to read again Robert > Wilton's email posted on November 2nd (Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:06:34 +0000) > again. He does talk about YANG library alignment - so YANG library > alignment is not just post LC comments. (I personally prefer to have > technical discussion than formal discussions but if it is necessary to > g there...)
Focusing a moment on the future and the technical, it would be most helpful to have a document that describes SM with NMDA and YL-bis. This would at least be a starting point for WG discussion. It might even help show if the current plan is flawed. I, personally, suspect that a proposal that changes basic approach, or revisits past arguments, will end up in another round of very long discussions based on what each party thinks is optimal. Therefore, I hope that the initial proposed solution would take a minimalistic change approach in order to garner widest support. This consensus foundation could then provide a foundation for further optimization to the degree supported by WG consensus. Lou > > /js > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
