On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on > Nov 6th. > > Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address > unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have been made, which > needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and > an alternate representation of inline schema. These have been considered > respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the position of > the chairs that it is best to advance the existing schema-mount document at > this time. >
If we take the formal road, then you may want to read again Robert Wilton's email posted on November 2nd (Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:06:34 +0000) again. He does talk about YANG library alignment - so YANG library alignment is not just post LC comments. (I personally prefer to have technical discussion than formal discussions but if it is necessary to g there...) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
