Great news.
Thanks,
Chris.
Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> writes:
Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion
of WGLC on Nov 6th.
Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments
are address unless significant faults are found. Post LC
comments have been made, which needed consideration, notably the
relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and an alternate
representation of inline schema. These have been considered
respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the
position of the chairs that it is best to advance the existing
schema-mount document at this time.
Given that there are significant concerns for how the solution
proposed in this draft operates with NMDA, we do think it
reasonable to add an applicability statement to the draft that
covers its operation in NMDA implementations. We do not believe
that such a statement substantively alters the draft nor would
it impact drafts that normatively reference the current draft.
In addition to resolving the remaining open thread [1], we also
agree with the recently made comment that the schema mount draft
should allow the use of rfc7895bis (i.e., not reference
/modules-state), thereby enabling the draft's use (though not
ideal) on servers supporting rfc7895bis.
The chairs will propose specific text for the updates mentioned
in this message to be reviewed by the WG for correctness before
final submission and advancement.
[1]
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg20049.html
Thanks,
Kent, Lou, and Joel
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
