On 14 Mar 2009 Michael Drake wrote: > In article <2fdad83b50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, > Richard Porter <r...@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
>> What I am saying is that implementing basic html should be a starting >> point, > Well it was, of course. NetSurf is a web browser after all. :) [snip] > I doubt this particular issue will be fixed before we move to our new > CSS engine. This is simply because it would not be sensible to spend a > lot of time tinkering with the current code when it will soon be > replaced with a better solution which should ultimately fix far more > issues than just this link colour issue. Michael, thank you for your courteous and informative response. Of course I agree that NS had to be designed around CSS from the start - I was just a little surprised that some (a rather inconsistent subset) of the "html presentational hints" had been ignored, but as you say development is dependent on what people are motivated to tackle. I hope that it will be possible for someone to have a look at these aspects in due course. Unless my circumstances change significantly I'm afraid that I won't be able to get involved in sufficient depth. Richard -- _ |_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ |\_||_ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of pointless clutter.
