On 14 Mar 2009 Keith Hopper wrote: > "Disabling" CSS makes absolutely no difference to the need for both of > the parts of the rendering engine. So! It would seem merely a > 'surface' option which placates a user but makes absolutely no > difference in the code which has to exist for any form of rendering to > take place. Perhaps it isn't a useful option after all??
I thimk you're Barking up the wrong creek. I'm not the one who's advocating disabling CSS but I can see the point. You might just stand a chance of making the content of an unreadable page readable even though you could lose its formatting. This could be useful where you have text and/or images obscuring one another. A related feature that I have requested is the ability to turn off document colours (as in Oregano) which could overcome lack of contrast problems. -- _ |_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ |\_||_ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of pointless clutter.
