On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:03 +0100 Steve Fryatt <li...@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote:
> There's "temporary", and "temporary". Also, until someone (Adam > Richardson, IIRC) came up with Cache, RISC OS didn't have defined > "somewhere" to store "non-transient internal data that isn't > choices". As such, Scrap seems to be the best compromise. Actually, that was my idea, and Adam has taken forward, and developed upon. :) Search the developer's list's archives back to almost 3 years ago; 12 June 2006, in a thread called "RUfl_cache". I don't think the idea got enough momentum to really take off; the suggestion being that not enough people sabotage their own system by putting !Scrap into a RAM disc for it to be worth it. B.
