Dave Miner writes: > > it was just moved, i updated the copyright info since wx pbchk was > > complaining. > > maybe this is wx ignorance on my part - it still needs to be in the active > > list > > due to the move, right? > > > > Interesting question - Teamware putbacks unassisted by wx will handle > the rename without any other change just fine. Additionally, suggested > copyright update policy is to only update on significant changes, and a > rename without any other change doesn't seem to qualify. Thus I think > wx is in error for complaining here.
wx shouldn't complain unless you accidentally added the file to the 'active' list. And Dave's right about the copyrights. More forcefully: we must _NOT_ update copyrights unless there's a non-trivial change to the contents. The copyright year, licensing terms, and even most comment changes don't qualify. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
