On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 5:47 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:33, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > my interpatation of statements like this is either it is no so freaking > > > far out of context no one can possibly figure it out, or the author > > > realllllllllly should go ahead and start back with the caffeine in > > > their coffee, or less working on beta testting of uubp. > > > > I don't need caffeine, et. The statement was that no-one at all had > > expressed any liking for the newer version of rpmdrake. This is patently > > untrue, but apparently those of us that do like it can be ignored. > > > > Anne > > Anne, you were'nt being ignored. Robert (and I myself for that matter) > was referring to *previous* posts prior to the advent of this thread. > Obviously Greg, B.Pflugmann, you and maybe others I haven't mentioned > have basically been in a war defending their rpmdrake 2.1. As such it > ought to be obvious that since there IS a large amount of activity in > this thread, we have two parties participating that have differing > points of view. Therefore, how can we be ignoring each other? > > If I should have responded to your earlier post, I apologize for not > doing so.
Lyvim - I guess we all have rough-edge moments. I took offence at one small statement, which is ridiculous. I'm amazed at the strength of feeling on this thread, but apologise for my over-sensitivity. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
