On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:33, Anne Wilson wrote: > > my interpatation of statements like this is either it is no so freaking far > > out of context no one can possibly figure it out, or the author > > realllllllllly should go ahead and start back with the caffeine in their > > coffee, or less working on beta testting of uubp. > > I don't need caffeine, et. The statement was that no-one at all had expressed > any liking for the newer version of rpmdrake. This is patently untrue, but > apparently those of us that do like it can be ignored. > > Anne
Anne, you were'nt being ignored. Robert (and I myself for that matter) was referring to *previous* posts prior to the advent of this thread. Obviously Greg, B.Pflugmann, you and maybe others I haven't mentioned have basically been in a war defending their rpmdrake 2.1. As such it ought to be obvious that since there IS a large amount of activity in this thread, we have two parties participating that have differing points of view. Therefore, how can we be ignoring each other? If I should have responded to your earlier post, I apologize for not doing so. LX -- 같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같� Kernel 2.4.21pre4-1mdk Mandrake Cooker 9.1 Enlightenment 0.16.5-12mdk Evolution 1.2.1-1mdk Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/ 같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같�
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
