On Friday 14 Feb 2003 11:14 am, et wrote: > On Friday 14 February 2003 04:25 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Friday 14 Feb 2003 12:51 am, et wrote: > > > well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in question; > > > "OK - if we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement, > > > perhaps you would like to explain it. > > > I don't agree with Rush Limbaugh, but I am pretty sure we both exist. > > > > Et - I did make the statement in question. It was in response to a > > statement (by Rob? not sure) that there had been not a single voice > > raised in support/liking for the newer interface (and BTW, it doesn't > > sound much different from 9.0's). That was patently untrue, though there > > are far more posts about disliking it. > > > > I have since apologised for my angry retort. Manners cost nothing. > > > > Anne > > I understood that, I just thought that my reply had caught the eye of > others who were also a bit hot under the collar, so to speak, and they were > hoping for something else to take out of context, I saw your apology and > explaination, and I hope everyone that had so much energy over a GUI, > noticed not one person said "so if you want the gui your way, learn perl > and/or C++ and write the GUI the way you want, since it (GNU-Linux) is all > about choice and learning." No one is stopping anyone from writting their > own GUI and offering it to the world as an additional choice. (it is > GNU/GPL is it not?)
Gerrofff! That's my line. 'Linux is about choice' <g> Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
