saaayyyy....
yours and mark sheppard's responses wouldn't have anything to do with 'road runner'
(that rr.com email address) being a business affiliate of microsoft, would it?
i mean, you do realize if that is why then this constitutes as spam?
and you do realize what it says about spamming on this list?
you can check it out here:
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/flists.php3
in the meantime, give us a break. everyone knows that if the boys from redmond
would open up their kernel source, everyone's programs would work a lot better. you
can't blame NS.
~p
Anthony Huereca wrote:
> IE may crash every once in a while, but it's a whole whole lot stabilier than
> Linux's Netscape. That thing crashes about once a hour, whereas IE might crash
> once a day at most. Sure, it doesn't bring down the whole system when Netscape
> crashes, but it is an annoyance and sometimes after it crashes, I get repeated
> errors about bookmarks being reloaded or something like that, which is also
> really annoying. I'd take IE over Netscape anyday with it's better features and
> stability.
>
> > You must have been charmed or blessed then, or had a priest bestow special
> > blessings on your copy of IE5 when you played a role playing game, or
> > something. After all, I can think of no *rational* explanation for your
> > experiences, given the frequency of IE5 crashing or otherwise misbehaving
> > on most installations. Mine, for example. True, it *does* crash less than
> > IE4 did -- even the IE5 *beta* crashed less. But it is still crash prone
> > like any M$ software.
>
> --
> Anthony Huereca
> http://m3000.1wh.com
> Press any key to continue and any other key to quit
