Charles Ulwelling wrote:
> Maxtorator,
>
> I'm going to hear about this... I am triple booting with win2000, and
> win98. I'm using them mainly because they work. Win98 crashes all the time
> but it is nice to have when I want to go back and play a game that doesn't
> run on win2000, which isn't very often since win2000 runs just about
> everything I have. I have win2000 because it is solid, and it is what I use
> to do all of my work in, I haven't had to reboot my computer once since I
> got it, except when I was trying to get linux to work(obviously). In my
> opinion I've never seen a machine run as well as mine does under 2000. I'm
> sorry but linux has many problems, it may work well for all of you and that
> is great, but I've had nothing but difficulty with it. It may be a PEBKAC
> problem but I don't believe so, since it dies immediately after being
> installed. If I have the choice between linux and win2000 I'd take win2000
> and thats why I'm dual booting, linux is only a hobby thing that I'm using
> to increase my knowledge of UNIX. I do not wish to make it my main OS, I'm
> perfectly happy with the one I'm using now.
>
> Please don't publically execute me for this, I've read all your posts and
> you all think windows suck and linux rules. That is cool, everyone is
> entitled to their opinions, so please don't send in 40 responses saying
> pendragon is sooooo wrong, one will be plenty... heh heh
I'm not going to publically execute you, but I read your post twice and I'm
damned if I can figure out what it has to do with the thread ...Linux is
slow...Please help.
Enjoy your windows.
Gene
