Everything stayed straight ? Still in perfect alignment with the back wheel ? 
How about in parallel with the rear wheel as in earlier testing ? (that's the 
second plane) Confirm both planes before we proceed. 90 degrees to floor and 
less than 1/8" off center from rear wheel. That's as good as it gets. 




________________________________
From: Glen <[email protected]>
To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 4:28:00 PM
Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further

Dennis:

All tight all right. What Next?

Glen

On Jan 28, 11:41 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Start by tightening the axle clamps. Front nuts first, then rear ones. 
> Recheck alignment. Position tubes in fork bridge clamps (so much above top 
> bridge) and tighten clamps. Recheck alignment. Install fender and fork brace 
> and recheck alignment. That reason behind this all is to see if at any time 
> it shifts. Constant rechecking after each step will show the exact component 
> that is at fault. If it doesn't move and stays right, all the better. Leave 
> the brake calipers off for now. Get back to me when this is completed. Brake 
> set-up is a bit more precise. If it moves as any clamp is tightened, note 
> which one and report in.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Glen <[email protected]>
> To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, January 28, 2010 7:36:58 PM
> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> Dennis:
>
> Its perfect! I tripple checked it with a square on each side both
> front and rear. Its right on!
>
> Whats next?
>
> On Jan 27, 11:41 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You didn't say you had the tubes off. Start at the common 3/8" position. 
> > We'll attend to those little details later. When you let the bike settle on 
> > the axle, keep the jack/s in place, we'll need them to support it during 
> > alignment. First order of business is to make this thing as straight as can 
> > be. Later is brakes, tube height,,, for now just the wheel in place. The 
> > method is quite simple once you understand how all this fits together. If 
> > it cannot be corrected in this manner, we look farther.
>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 11:05:56 PM
> > Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > Dennis:
>
> > Bearings seem fine, spacer is present, spedo tangs looks fine and were/
> > are aligned. I cleaned out the factory grease in the spedo and
> > replaced with a quality bearing grease. Japan doesnt make good grease
> > and they are very skimpy with it. Before setting the wheel to the
> > forks, shouldn't I set the forks to the bike? How far above the upper
> > clamp should I set each fork?  Left and right the same height? Shop
> > manual gives no guidence as to fork placement in the clamps and I did
> > not mark them last year when I replaced the fork seals.
>
> > I fabricated independent adjustable jacks for each side of the bike to
> > hold the front end off the ground while on the center stand so I could
> > replace the fork seals last year. However they are not adjustable once
> > the weight is on them, so I am going to have to wait until I can get
> > some help to square the rear wheel and lower the forks onto the
> > wheel.
>
> > Glen.
>
> > On Jan 27, 9:41 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Bearings good ? spacer present ? Speedometer drive tangs in proper place 
> > > ?  Reassemble and snug (not torque) axle nut. Bike is on center stand.. 
> > > right ? Use a carpenters square against the back wheel and shim one of 
> > > the center stand feet if need be so that the rear wheel is a perfect 90 
> > > to the floor. You need this as a reference when putting the front end 
> > > back together. Bike supported by some kind of adjustable jack ? Lower 
> > > front end till it rests on the axle. Leave calipers off at this point. 
> > > Lightly snug the fork bottom clamps against the axle. (finger tight) 
> > > Check for alignment with rear wheel. Report back.
>
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 6:21:36 PM
> > > Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > Dennis:
>
> > > After an over night soak in blaster and a longer wrench from a
> > > neighbor I got the axel apart.  The axel is straight and all parts are
> > > present according to my shop manual.
>
> > > What next?
>
> > > Captain Obvious:  Yes, I have been using "PB"  Blaster and a Heat Gun,
> > > would have used a torch but I did not want to melt the bearring dust
> > > covers or plastic gears in the spedo. The problem was leverage... size
> > > does matter!
>
> > > Glen
>
> > > On Jan 27, 3:21 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I am starting to lose it.
>
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Kim Paddock <[email protected]>
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 8:35:10 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > > Hey Dennis...will you tell this wingnut that he needs to use PB blaster 
> > > > to get his axle nut loose? He listens to you...somewhat.
>
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]>
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 9:36:26 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > > I wouldn't reassemble it till I found out why that is. Too many parts 
> > > > in there to disregard. Stepped spacer one side, speedometer drive other 
> > > > side. Two bearings, spacer inside. Axle nut 54' lbs. should be tight 
> > > > but not stuck on unless over tightened. Over tightened would damage 
> > > > bearings and pull fork tubes together. Missing internal spacer would 
> > > > allow nut to be over tightened. Incorrect drive installation would 
> > > > spread forks. Maybe it's fine. The bottom line is, it's your butt. For 
> > > > me, I wanna' know. The tire was the giveaway that something is wrong. 
> > > > Don't quit untill you know and correct it. I can't work this way, my 
> > > > job depends on me doing it right. For me, I'd put a socket on the fixed 
> > > > end bolt head and clamp a breaker bar in a vise, and use the same deal 
> > > > on the nut end. Put a piece of pipe on the bar and...it's coming off. I 
> > > > can't let a customer ride a bike I "think" is OK. It better be right.
>
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > > > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 8:42:32 PM
> > > > Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > > Dennis:
>
> > > > I cant get the axel nut loose and I am afraid I am going to break a
> > > > nuckle or worse something on the bike.   The wheel appears to spin
> > > > true.I think the axel is fine.  I would like to proceed with
> > > > reassembly.  Please advise.  Please note I have replaced the brake
> > > > pads already.
>
> > > > Glen
>
> > > > On Jan 26, 12:41 am, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Send pix as attachments. The wear you describe is not right. Pads 
> > > > > should wear evenly. Wheel is cocked to do this. Your measurements 
> > > > > showed this too. That would cause the contact patch to be off-center. 
> > > > > A careful re-assembly is going to take care of this. Still have to 
> > > > > inspect the axle and get that right first. Gee, this bike will be 
> > > > > totally different when you get done. Handle and brake better.
>
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > > > > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> > > > > Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 12:29:33 AM
> > > > > Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > > > Dennis;
>
> > > > > I do not know how to post a picture to an existing string.  The pads
> > > > > are worn as if on a skew. One pads is thinner at the top then it is at
> > > > > the bottom and the other pad is the opposite thicker on  the top then
> > > > > on the bottom. Wheel spin was relative to axel in hand.  When in the
> > > > > forks without brakes wheel spins smooth and easy. I took a picture of
> > > > > the pads and will try to e-mail to you directly.Still can get nut off
> > > > > soking it in blaster.
>
> > > > > Glen
>
> > > > > On Jan 25, 11:22 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Wear is uneven ? Send pix. Wheel requires some effort to turn ? 
> > > > > > Something very wrong here. Get the axle apart and see. Resolve this 
> > > > > > before we go any further. This sounds like an assembly problem. 
> > > > > > Incorrect order of assembly or parts missing. The speedo drive 
> > > > > > cannot drag the wheel down but a missing bearing spacer would. 
> > > > > > Let's see the pads and what they tell us. The wear pattern is a 
> > > > > > giveaway.
>
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > > > > > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Sent: Mon, January 25, 2010 9:27:36 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: alignment further
>
> > > > > > Dennis:
>
> > > > > > I have rexamined everything very closley and here is what I found:
>
> > > > > > Found a very small amount of play in the neck, tightened 1/8 turn.
>
> > > > > > Brake pads are mettalic and wear is uneven and down to 1/8 inch or
> > > > > > less (I have new organic pads).
>
> > > > > > I still cant get axle nut loose. Fok oil leaked out of the anti-dive
> > > > > > adjust. Leak is now fixed will try to get axle nut off again later.
> > > > > > Spinning wheel in the forks it looked true and has no play. Axle 
> > > > > > spins
> > > > > > but not without effort, I am  assuming speedo is slowing it down.
>
> > > > > > I examined the fork tubes carefully with a strait edge and I cant 
> > > > > > find
> > > > > > any defects.
>
> > > > > > What course of action do you recommend next?
>
> > > > > > Glen
>
> > > > > > On Jan 24, 11:12 pm, Dennis Hammerl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Is there any movement of the relationship between the upper and 
> > > > > > > lower fork bridges while twisting ? Did you get the axle out ?
> > > > > > > While twisting the tubes, is there any movement of the very 
> > > > > > > bottom of the fork ? Your measurements show that there is 
> > > > > > > something flexed somewhere. The first things to flex are fork 
> > > > > > > tubes. That's why this is so important. If you can't find any 
> > > > > > > deviation in any component, then let's try reassembly in a very 
> > > > > > > special sequence.
>
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Snookfever <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers! 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > Sent:
>
> ...
>
> read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to