Hello Howard, Check /etc/sysconfig/network and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/.
I have been using CentOS on some stuff for a while, but not the desktop version. If I was guessing I would not be surprised if they are using something in the way of NetworkManager, which I have found to be a very evil problem in the past. I forget what I installed on the laptop as an alternative, but I got really tired of fixing the problems (which are most likely now fixed) in the NetworkManager program. Dave On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 13:19 -0600, Howard wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have a spanking new CentOS desktop install in front of me that is > playing silly with networking. The install process from DVD seems to > have gone according to plan. Yet its network configuration is not > working. I've reviewed the following: > > /etc/resolv.conf as expected > /etc/network as expected > > /etc/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 normal > > The results of a route command are most troubling - no default gateway > even there is one in the /etc/network file. Why does route show > 169.254.0.0 assigned to eth0? > > I just added a default route and am now able to get to the network. Is > this a know fault?? > > Howard
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
