ouch, you thought that meant for you? :(
sorry, terrible wording then.
That sentence feels to me like the usual "boiler-plate" for an
opensource program and why it can be good.
I guess the idea was to sorta write the first info in a more formal,
marketing-like speech.
But didnt come that way to you and likely a few others.
I can assure you it was not the intention.
On 04/01/21 00:50, J. Liles wrote:
My mistake. It says "spyware".
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:48 PM Filipe Coelho <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can you please clarify?
The announcement is at
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-announce/2020-June/002820.html
Where is it implied that non-session-manager is malware?
I do realize your name was not in that announcement.
This was not intentional.
I am sorry for that, you absolutely and clearly deserve credit for
NSM.
On 04/01/21 00:29, J. Liles wrote:
Indeed. In the LAA announcement post he implied that
non-session-manager malware as well.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:22 PM Marc Lavallée <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I did not know about New Session Manager, only a bit about Non.
Now I'm reading this page:
https://linuxaudio.github.io/new-session-manager/
The description looks like Non is almost a proprietary
software, and that New is trying to "fix that" as a
"community version". Non is released as a GPL2 software, so
clearly there was no need to fork it as a "community
version". It there's a better reason (that could be mentioned)?
GPL2 does not mean "free lunch"; there's other licenses for that.
Marc
Le 21-01-03 à 19 h 08, Filipe Coelho a écrit :
On 03/01/21 23:57, rosea.grammostola wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, January 4, 2021 12:47 AM, Filipe Coelho
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
1. the new-session-manager fork was done by Nils, not me.
I appreciated the effort and contributed some little
things afterwards.
The idea for a fork was yours Filipe. You're fully
responsible for it, together with Nils. There is no point
in denying or downplaying your role.
Huh? Where did you get this from?
I approved the idea of a fork, yes. Not sure if I was the
first one to suggest it, I am pretty sure a bunch of people
thought about it too.
I did say that I would maintain the "old" GUI if needed, you
can point the finger at me for that.
But wait, just because I have an idea for something, how
does it make me responsible for it?
It would not have happened if others did not have interest
on it.
Stop making it all on me.
Thanks
