Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> Dnia Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:08:48PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec napisał(a):
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>>
>>> (And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get....)
>> About 10 times easier to write definitions to "transform" XML into a
>> valid ConTeXt document (to write definitions in such a way that
>> ConTeXt will "understand" the XML) ... But it's true that XML parsing
>> is not 100% stable yet.
>
> And where is any documentation for that? (Or at least examples?)
i hope to have that ready at the context conference
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
