In my experience, while Ntop is a wicked cool tool, it's stability is
dependent on many factors, not just the OS.

Until Ntop 3.1, I could rarely keep a runtime up for more than a day or so.
The biggest issue generally being resource utilization (i.e. memory). But
I'll say that 3.1 definitely seems SIGNIFICANTLY more stable for me than any
previous version.

However, if you "can't afford any application segfault", you probably want
to look at a commercial solution. With relatively few exceptions, I don't
recommend putting mission-critical services on OpenSource implementations
(those exceptions being things like Sendmail and BIND, which have multiple
decades of development behind them).
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Antonio Mitarotondo
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 5:20 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Ntop] NTop
> 
> Hello all.
> We need to deploy a very stable NTop installation. We can't 
> afford any 
> application segfault in a prolonged period of time while 
> monitoring about 
> 2000+ nodes.
> 
> Does exist a NTop/O.S. combination which is provenly better 
> than the others?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --Tony
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> 
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to