On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote: > If this was common knowledge, I'm surprised it wasn't > mentioned a week or two ago when the slow msg delivery > was such an issue.
Why mention it if it's common knowledge? > That would be like MS licensing Exchange not on total number > of mailboxes, or store size, but the number of messages your > server could send in any given hour. And why is one arbitrary licensing model any better than another? Licensing per message sent is arguably the closest to usage-based billing. If you have a lot of lists but almost no traffic, you're not getting more use out of the software. If you have a lot subscribers but almost no traffic, you're not getting more use out of the software. So this is arguably "more fair". On the gripping hand, why anyone would *pay* for a list server when both Majordomo and GNU Mailman are free -- and apparently work better -- is beyond me. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
