The list performance hasn't been an issue, before. On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> wrote:
> Lyris has been licenced like this since (at least) the 1990s. > > Can we move on please? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2012 9:34 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Good SBS list > > I admittedly deaned a whole slew of messages from here... fortunately I > didn't miss the real important stuff about BBQ sauce or the one about Bruce > Wayne masquerading as an IT guy with an anonymous gmail account. > > If this was common knowledge, I'm surprised it wasn't mentioned a week or > two ago when the slow msg delivery was such an issue. > > That having been said... I maintain it's rather funky licensing model. > License via CPU core, membership size, total # of lists, etc..., that seems > to be more a more reasonable method that most vendors that sell mail > servers, databases, etc... follow. > > That would be like MS licensing Exchange not on total number of mailboxes, > or store size, but the number of messages your server could send in any > given hour. > > -sc > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:54 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Good SBS list > > Sunbelt/GFI posted some time ago about the Lyris situation (please try to > keep up). It's due to a licensing change in the newer version of Lyris, > and they didn't want to pay the higher price to unthrottle message delivery. > > Carl > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:04 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Good SBS list > > > Again, the issue is rate limiting (messages per time) in the Lyris > software. Adding more computrons won't make it go faster. > > That's what I find odd. You described it as " an artificial limit". And I > assume that if The Powers that Be are suggesting that's the cause it's not > a configurable parameter. > > Not a very "commercial grade" feature if it can't be changed and it's > ham-stringing your 16-core 32GB server sitting behind a 100Mb > metro-ethernet link...[1] > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
