We use NOD32 on our servers.  Was a bit disappointed with this recent
ranking report.
 
http://mtc.sri.com/live_data/av_rankings/

________________________________

From: Jonathan Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 1:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Corporate antivirus recommendation


I recommend ESET NOD, above all others.  My team actually ran trials and
performed research on Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro, ESET, Kaspersky,
and very recently Vipre.
 
We have been running NOD in our 3-hospital environment for over 2 years
with resounding success - this is not a paid advertisement ;)
 
_________________________________
Jonathan Merrill
MCP, CCA, NET+
Information Technology
www.gomerrill.com <http://www.gomerrill.com/> 
_________________________________





________________________________


Subject: Corporate antivirus recommendation
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:51:15 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com




Hi folks,

 

I know this is not an unusual request, but just thought I might get some
updated opinions from people. I'm thinking of re-evaluating our
allegiance to Trend Micro for desktop antivirus. Not that they've done
anything wrong, just think it's time to take a look around and see if
newer or better things are out there.

 

My top three requirements would be:

 

1)      Excellent threat detection record and frequent updates to threat
definitions.

2)      Good admin interface with easy and reliable remote installs.

3)      Good deep scanning ability of clients with a real-time scan that
doesn't hog resources.

 

I've heard good things about Kaspersky. Anyone have thoughts about going
in that direction?

 

And yes, Stu, I know you will recommend Vipre...  <g>. Just looking for
some unbiased user opinions.

 

Feel free to email me off-list if more comfortable.

 

Thanks,

 

Evan


 

 





 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to