Thanks Phil, That is an important note for clients moving from 32 bit to
64 bit applications.   It also looks like you have to be putting at
least 8 servers on a physical box to make it cost effective.

I am also somewhat concerned with the true isolation of a client's VPS
if a single Hardware layer is presented vs what I perceive to be a more
isolated and resilient hardware layer per VM. What happens in one VM
does not cross over to all the others.  I have a lot more to read on
this, I just started today so I thank you for the info it has made a lot
of concepts click.

Thanks

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtuozzo Migration

It's not that Virtuozzo limits you to a particular SW platform, it
limits you to ONE specific operating system release on ONE CPU
architecture. If you choose to use 64-bit Server 2003 Enterprise R2 in
your containers, that's what you're stuck with. If you need something
else (say, 32-bit Server 2003 Standard R2) you need a new virtualization
server, or forgo virualization altogether for that one machine.

To give you something to compare it to, Virtuozzo is similar in concept
to FreeBSD jails and Solaris containers.

VMware ESX may be less efficient than VZ, but you gain infinitely more
flexibility. I've personally run 64-bit Linux, 32-bit Linux, 64-bit
2003, 32-bit 2003, and 32-bit NetBSD on an ESX box at the same time...
can't do that with VZ.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So far it seems that the proc and memory mgmt in VZ is better than
> VMWare, so why would a company consolidating servers or looking for
> expansion go with VMWare over VZ if they are staying all on the same
SW
> platform?

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to