On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 18:27 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think I clearly explained the difference above. I'll repeat: 'If a > monopoly carrier chooses not to allow others to have access to its > network > for resale, it should be bound by the "neutrality"'. > > Which part of this is unclear? > > -alex
The part where you fail to admit that regulating common carrier networks is fair and right without being a communist plot. Ruben -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
