We either need an explicit string for the null callback, or we need to increment the version number, because the SP needs a way to determine which OAuth dialect the consumer is speaking as early on in the dance as possible.
I believe that it's more pain than its worth to increment the version number, so we'll need a string literal. I vote for "oob" since it's as good as any, and its already in Draft 1. Allen Luca Mearelli wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Blaine Cook <rom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2. String literal "none" >> 3. String literal, other than "none" >> > > +1 for an explicit string (whether "none" or "oob") > > Luca > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
