in the short term yes growth stock will beat the market, but in the long run value stocks will beat growth stocks
W On 17/02/2009, RATU SIMA <ratus...@gmail. com> wrote: > Dear Sylar_Fang, > > While enjoying my evening's cigar & a glass of red wine here, I'll explain a > little: > A great investor will only concentrate on growth stocks, of which its > CANSLIM requirements are duly met. > S/he will verify their fundamental real condition, such as earning growth, > QonQ comparison, clean corporate governance, strong expansion (but not based > on credit system), sound subsidiaries, and so on so forth. > > Contrary to growth stocks, a great investor does not fully trust the > cyclical stock. The merit of cyclical stock is exercised by big fund / > market maker of which price movement isn't energized by its CANSLIM, BUT > merely on the strength within the market makers. > > For scalpers, swingers, intraday traders who are skilled and trained, it > might give them additional profit in relatively little by little amount due > to the thin volume & price range that real time market relinquishes. > > Unfortunately for investors, the risk might not be equal to its reward. > Worse when such cyclical stock is occupied & owned by big fund / financial > institutions, it could tumble the whole aggregate stock index miserably > because its cap market enables it to do so. > > Under this circumstance, the overall stock market condition is NOT SOUND > YET. > > Love, > Aimee from Guang Zhou >