YUP - banyakan yg cut (profit/loss), yah - tadi pagi2...
> Ahh gak usah didenger kata2 si Ratu Bearish hehehe .. dengerkan aja > info dunia resmi,dan yg kita liat/denger dg mata kepala dan kuping > dan jangan terpengaruh sama info si bear yg pasti tidak selalu > akurat.. > > > Rgrds > > > Andre Andre <andre...@...> wrote: >> >> in the short term yes growth stock will beat the market, but in > the long run value stocks will beat growth stocks >> >> >> >> >> >> >> W >> On 17/02/2009, RATU SIMA <ratus...@gmail. com> wrote: >> > Dear Sylar_Fang, >> > >> > While enjoying my evening's cigar & a glass of red wine here, > I'll explain a >> > little: >> > A great investor will only concentrate on growth stocks, of which > its >> > CANSLIM requirements are duly met. >> > S/he will verify their fundamental real condition, such as > earning growth, >> > QonQ comparison, clean corporate governance, strong expansion > (but not based >> > on credit system), sound subsidiaries, and so on so forth. >> > >> > Contrary to growth stocks, a great investor does not fully trust > the >> > cyclical stock. The merit of cyclical stock is exercised by big > fund / >> > market maker of which price movement isn't energized by its > CANSLIM, BUT >> > merely on the strength within the market makers. >> > >> > For scalpers, swingers, intraday traders who are skilled and > trained, it >> > might give them additional profit in relatively little by little > amount due >> > to the thin volume & price range that real time market > relinquishes. >> > >> > Unfortunately for investors, the risk might not be equal to its > reward. >> > Worse when such cyclical stock is occupied & owned by big fund / > financial >> > institutions, it could tumble the whole aggregate stock index > miserably >> > because its cap market enables it to do so. >> > >> > Under this circumstance, the overall stock market condition is > NOT SOUND >> > YET. >> > >> > Love, >> > Aimee from Guang Zhou >> > >> > > >
