Ahh gak usah didenger kata2 si Ratu Bearish hehehe .. dengerkan aja 
info dunia resmi,dan yg kita liat/denger dg mata kepala dan kuping 
dan jangan terpengaruh sama info si bear yg pasti tidak selalu 
akurat..


Rgrds


Andre Andre <andre...@...> wrote:
>
>   in the short term yes growth stock will beat the market, but in 
the long run value stocks will beat growth stocks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> W
> On 17/02/2009, RATU SIMA <ratus...@gmail. com> wrote:
> > Dear Sylar_Fang,
> >
> > While enjoying my evening's cigar & a glass of red wine here, 
I'll explain a
> > little:
> > A great investor will only concentrate on growth stocks, of which 
its
> > CANSLIM requirements are duly met.
> > S/he will verify their fundamental real condition, such as 
earning growth,
> > QonQ comparison, clean corporate governance, strong expansion 
(but not based
> > on credit system), sound subsidiaries, and so on so forth.
> >
> > Contrary to growth stocks, a great investor does not fully trust 
the
> > cyclical stock. The merit of cyclical stock is exercised by big 
fund /
> > market maker of which price movement isn't energized by its 
CANSLIM, BUT
> > merely on the strength within the market makers.
> >
> > For scalpers, swingers, intraday traders who are skilled and 
trained, it
> > might give them additional profit in relatively little by little 
amount due
> > to the thin volume & price range that real time market 
relinquishes.
> >
> > Unfortunately for investors, the risk might not be equal to its 
reward.
> > Worse when such cyclical stock is occupied & owned by big fund / 
financial
> > institutions, it could tumble the whole aggregate stock index 
miserably
> > because its cap market enables it to do so.
> >
> > Under this circumstance, the overall stock market condition is 
NOT SOUND
> > YET.
> >
> > Love,
> > Aimee from Guang Zhou
> >
>


Kirim email ke