Ahh gak usah didenger kata2 si Ratu Bearish hehehe .. dengerkan aja info dunia resmi,dan yg kita liat/denger dg mata kepala dan kuping dan jangan terpengaruh sama info si bear yg pasti tidak selalu akurat..
Rgrds Andre Andre <andre...@...> wrote: > > in the short term yes growth stock will beat the market, but in the long run value stocks will beat growth stocks > > > > > > > W > On 17/02/2009, RATU SIMA <ratus...@gmail. com> wrote: > > Dear Sylar_Fang, > > > > While enjoying my evening's cigar & a glass of red wine here, I'll explain a > > little: > > A great investor will only concentrate on growth stocks, of which its > > CANSLIM requirements are duly met. > > S/he will verify their fundamental real condition, such as earning growth, > > QonQ comparison, clean corporate governance, strong expansion (but not based > > on credit system), sound subsidiaries, and so on so forth. > > > > Contrary to growth stocks, a great investor does not fully trust the > > cyclical stock. The merit of cyclical stock is exercised by big fund / > > market maker of which price movement isn't energized by its CANSLIM, BUT > > merely on the strength within the market makers. > > > > For scalpers, swingers, intraday traders who are skilled and trained, it > > might give them additional profit in relatively little by little amount due > > to the thin volume & price range that real time market relinquishes. > > > > Unfortunately for investors, the risk might not be equal to its reward. > > Worse when such cyclical stock is occupied & owned by big fund / financial > > institutions, it could tumble the whole aggregate stock index miserably > > because its cap market enables it to do so. > > > > Under this circumstance, the overall stock market condition is NOT SOUND > > YET. > > > > Love, > > Aimee from Guang Zhou > > >
