On Mar 29, 2008, at 20:53, Glynn Foster wrote: > How far do we want to take things here, should we go down that path. > Do we try and continuously find new meanings in the text, work > around it, or otherwise? I guess what I'm trying to determine is > what precedent are we going to set for future OGB boards?
I think we want to observe where there is a perceived obstacle to our effectiveness. In those areas alone, we should then seek to agree an interpretation of the constitution that removes the obstacle. If we can't do that we should then take more extreme action. I'd suggest enabling the conduct of business via e-mail is one of those cases where there's a perceived obstacle. S.
