> Doug Meerschaert > > Paul has a valid point, Ryan. If the spell summaries are *not* > in the SRD, > wouldn't it be a technical violation of WotC's copyright on those short > spell descriptions? Oh NOW I see what you're talking about. Well, they are easy enough to create if they don't get included in the SRD. I see them as pretty hand myself, so perhaps they could be included, if not by level then as part of the alphabetical listing? Formatting isn't really a priority as much as not having to retype everything. -Brad
- [ogf-d20-l] D20 License Question: Experience Costs John Nephew
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 License Question: Experience Cos... Brad Thompson
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] D20 License Question: Experience... Keith Johnson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 License Question: Experi... korath
- [ogf-d20-l] Updates to the SRD, success ... Brad Thompson
- [ogf-d20-l] SRD as a Zip File Brad Thompson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] SRD as a Zip Fi... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Updates to the SRD,... Aaron Smalley
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] D20 License Question: Experience Cos... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Updates to SRD Doug Meerschaert
- [ogf-d20-l] Updates to SRD Brad Thompson
- [ogf-d20-l] Updates to SRD Ryan S. Dancey
