Faustus von Goethe wrote:
> OGL #2. The License: . . . No other terms or conditions may be applied to
> any Open Game Content distributed using this License.
>
> Since we have already determined on this list (I thought) that the OGL
> applies to the WHOLE DOCUMENT, is there a legal grounds for doing this? I
> thought that material in an OGL document could be either "open" or "PI".
> Sounds like what you are proposing violates the OGL?
Yes, Clark, are you sure you can pull this off without bringing the WotC
lawyers down on you? I know that you being a lawyer may help you defend
against such a prospect, but how are you interpreting this portion of
the OGL?
Does anyone else have an opinion or idea on this matter? Under what
conditions can another license apply to a document containing content
covered by the OGL. Can you have the document set up so that the OGL
applies to "portions" and have another license apply to other portions
of the document?
--
Aaron Smalley
ICQ#: 2080100
Home: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
