> Alec A. Burkhardt
>
> OGL#2 says you cannot have an additional license that applies to Open Game
> Content. Having not seen the license in R&R, I assumed from Clark's post
> that the new license is in regards to the use of the spell names. Spell
> names are not automatically Open Game Content but can be designated as
> Product Identity. If this is what has been done with the license in R&R
> it is exactly in keeping with the spirit of the OGL as it has been
> discussed on this list.
That's exactly what I did with the Wp/Vp document I wrote - the title and
foreword were designated as PI, while the rest of the document was OGC.
Then I immediately granted everyone license to use the PI so long as they
didn't modify the OGC. That way, they can tweak the OGC to their heart's
content so long as they don't use the title, but wherever you see the title
you know its always the original stuff. I suspect that's what Clark and
Steve are doing as well.
-Brad
