Some sources have place of birth and death -- would that argue for the  
bio: properties?

kc

Quoting Rob Styles <rob.sty...@talis.com>:

> I would normally argue for identifying all things of interest as a
> resource, events being commonly overlooked.
>
> In that vain, identifying the birth event would make sense, however my
> reason for trying to identify all objects of interest (including
> events) is that it allows you and others to say things about them.
>
> In the case of births, and deaths but less so, there doesn't seem to
> be much in the way of things to say, so I am less convinced of the
> value over a simple birthdate property.
>
> Rob Styles
> Talis
>
> On 9 Jun 2010, at 20:43, "Lee Passey" <l...@novomail.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6/8/2010 7:19 PM, Ross Singer wrote
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Interesting you consider RDF/FOAF a "band-wagon", considering FOAF
>>> predates JSON (outside of merely being considered "a subset of
>>> JavaScript").  It might also be considered "a ranklable offense" to
>>> disparage RDF simply because you don't understand it or it's not
>>> useful to you.  Do the JSON and XML serializations require this level
>>> of justification?
>>
>> Absolutely.
>>
>> As a matter of fact, I think OL's decision to use JSON, not merely
>> as a
>> data transfer format but also as a data storage format, to be probably
>> the most ill-advised decision it has ever made. I suspect that the
>> decision was made almost exclusively as a "band-wagon," and had this
>> kind of spirited debate occurred at that time we would have had a much
>> more robust data set with fewer duplicates.
>>
>> As it happens, I am becoming convinced that "foaf:person" and the
>> "foaf"
>> name variations are probably the best choice for encapsulating
>> personal
>> information in OL RDF, and I am arriving at that conclusion primarily
>> because of the information and arguments made here.
>>
>> Debate is good.
>>
>> Questioning assumptions is good.
>>
>> Trying to identify your consumer and his/her/its needs is good.
>>
>> Unquestioning acceptance of the latest fad is bad.
>>
>> That having been said, I think the best way to encode dates of birth
>> and
>> death should be:
>>
>> <bio:Birth>
>>   <dc:date
>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime";>[some
>> date]</dc:date>
>> </bio:Birth>
>> <bio:Death>
>>   <dc:date
>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime";>[some
>> date]</dc:date>
>> </bio:Death>
>>
>> Would someone like to talk me out of this now?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ol-tech mailing list
>> Ol-tech@archive.org
>> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to   
>> ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/
> shared innovation™
>
> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not   
> be those of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of   
> this email message and any files that may be attached are   
> confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If   
> you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message   
> to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an   
> unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
>
> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies   
> and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office   
> at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
> _______________________________________________
> Ol-tech mailing list
> Ol-tech@archive.org
> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to   
> ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

_______________________________________________
Ol-tech mailing list
Ol-tech@archive.org
http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to 
ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org

Reply via email to