On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:03:48PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: >> What *is* open is the development _process_. ?Meaning: >> >> ?- design reviews (these are not formally part of the Solaris >> ? ?development process nowadays, but i-teams often do these in the open) >> >> ?- architectural reviews >> >> ?- code reviews > > I need to qualify the above. ?Only ARC review must be open today[*]. > Project teams may or may not, but really should do design and code > reviews in the open. ?If you see a push that you care about that was not > reviewed publicly you might want to complain. > > It would be nice if RTIs were public (except for sec vulns) so that > community members could see what CRs are being fixed and comment on any > where there's been no public code review.
You might want to ask tools-discuss where that stands, IIRC, that's in the works. > [*] There can be closed cases, but to integrate into OpenSolaris they > ? ?have to eventually be opened and, IIRC, re-reviewed. ?There still > ? ?aren't any non-Sun ARC members, so re-review would be fairly > ? ?pointless right now. > > Nico > -- > _______________________________________________ > on-discuss mailing list > on-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-discuss >
