Am 10/22/2011 02:33 AM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano:
Hi Rob and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org> wrote:
So these are user lists. Will we want language-specific translation
and localization lists at some point? That is why I thought it would
make sense to have "user" in the name. So then in the future we can
have, e..g., ooo-translate-de, etc., if needed.
You are right!
How about letting them discuss on what kind of native language lists
they would like to have in the future in their general native language
list like ooo-general...@incubator.apache.org ?
:)
May I propose a way to create a native language list?
:)
In general we create a native language list if requested and as requested.
("oo" means an ISO language code)
1. First someone should propose ooo-general...@incubator.apache.org at
ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
2. Once created, in ooo-general...@incubator.apache.org they will
discuss in their language about additional lists for their language.
3. They discuss on names of lists etc. then they propose additional
lists for their language like ooo-users...@incubator.apache.org,
ooo-translate...@incubator.apache.org and more.
"Let them discuss what they need in their language" the best way, I think.
:)
Wouldn't this also mean "tell us which MLs you need additionally and we
(the PPMC) will create them."
Finally, this will lead to the same ML structure like in the old OOo
project. And this is the point we want to avoid with a new ML handling,
right?
So, I'm OK with creating one new ML for other languages but we should be
careful with creating additional ones.
My 2 ct.
Marcus
