On 10/31/2011 18:22, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 3:15 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
Hi, Dennis,
On 10/31/2011 16:13, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: <snip>
Yes, I am subscribed to ooo-commits. Unfortunately, the CWiki
commits don't come over as diffs but as complete text before and
after. So I rarely read them. For me, all they serve as is a
reminder to go to the CWiki page and find out what really
happened. I find ooo-issues much easier to handle.
<snip>
This is a matter of how you set your preferences in Cwiki. You have
to allow delivery of notices in HTML, because the diffs come in
color, just like what you see on the Cwiki when you click, "view
changes". I'm getting both diff and full-text at the moment, which
is very handy: if I need to see the change in full context, I can
look at the second message, otherwise not. --/tj/
That is true. Unfortunately according to this[1] it is against ASF
Policy. One of the motivations for the Apache CMS was how poorly
Confluence performs. [2]
Regards, Dave
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/#Index-Postingemailalertstoamailinglist
[2] http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#confluence-limitations
Hi, Dave,
Thanks for the fascinating links. I expect to be making a lot of use of
Apache CMS: to my proof-reader's eye, many of the ASF pages look
somewhat shabby and neglected. One example is the penultimate sentence
in http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#build
My bad: since the discussion was in the context of coo-commits, I should
have made it clear that I was talking about watch-list messages, sent
straight to the watcher.
(I find the general ban on HTML obnoxious, though I understand at least
some of the rationale. I am absolutely /lost/ without my /stress
italics./ :-) )
--
/tj/
