--- Gio 12/1/12, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> ha scritto: ... > > If you look carefully, you'll see that SVN, via the website > stuff that is now there, has tons of content now that is in > incompatible licenses, in the form of GPL and other licensed > documentation. Ditto for the wiki. Ditto for extensions site. > These are all hosted by the Apache, on behalf of the project, > but they are not part of our releases. Are you saying SVN > must be cleaned of all of that, even if it is not part of our > releases? >
I certainly had understood the policy for website, Wiki and even the extensions site is that we shouldn't be hosting copyleft content. There might be a transitory situation during incubation and some things are still to be decided but even you have clearly stood in the position where any new content in the Wiki, etc should be under AL2. > > I'm happy to have someone review the issue, if you can > state what the policy issue is. I simply don't see any > problem here. We're not including category-b source code > in our release, period. > I am really not going into this discussion with you again. I think the issue is very easy to resolve: drop the tarballs from SVN and provide sufficient instructions so that the people doing the builds can download the tarballs themselves: we even have nice "fetch_tarball.sh" script to do just that. Pedro.
