In addition, QA site is too old and need updated. 2012/5/2 Yan Ji <yanji...@gmail.com>: > From QA perspective, I think we need to build up the QA project and process > asap. Automation framework and test tool should be available soon for all > tester in this project. > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji > > On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> I'm already starting to get questions on what we'll be doing after AOO >> 3.4 is released. Based on previous conversations on this list, I'm >> able to speak confidently about a few things: >> >> 1) We'll probably graduate to a Top Level Project >> >> 2) IBM says they will contribute Symphony source code after 3.4 is released >> >> 3) We have some initial feature ideas for AOO 4.0 on the wiki: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Feature+Planning >> >> 4) We also have some ideas listed for an AOO 4.1: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Feature+Planning >> >> Beyond that, do we have anything to say? >> >> I've heard some discussions that we might want an AOO 3.4.1, which would: >> >> A) Add some additional translations >> >> B) Fix any important bugs that are found in AOO 3.4 >> >> C) Uncertain if it would have new features? >> >> What time frame would this be? It seems like it takes around 4-6 >> weeks to iterate on dev builds, do regression testing, cut a Release >> Candidate, have a two-stage release vote and get the new build >> distributed. So it seems it would need to be at least that far out, >> plus whatever time it takes to do the translations and bug fixing. >> >> Does anyone want to start a wiki page for AOO 3.4.1 and start >> collecting proposed translations and bugs for that release? >> >> -Rob >
-- Best Regards >From aliu...@gmail.com
