On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:11 +0100, sebb wrote: > On 13 June 2012 01:33, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:28 +0100, sebb wrote: > >> On 12 June 2012 22:34, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:48 -0400, drew wrote: > >> >> I would like to propose that we treat the 13th of the month as our 1st > >> >> Anniversary and would like to do the following for the occasion: > >> >> > >> > <snip> > >> > > >> >> I would like to release two CD iso images, Windows and Mac on the 13th > >> >> of this month. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Howdy, > >> > > >> > Alright - well, cutting it right down to the end on time here. > >> > > >> > I just want to be sure, as I'm not sure this is right branding wise - if > >> > you anyone sees a problem with this let me know, I don't mind re-working > >> > things. I also won't be offended if anyone says hold up.. > >> > > >> > Here is the final cut on five items: > >> > > >> > A disk label: > >> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-label-win.png > >> > > >> > Envelope/Sleeve cover: > >> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-sleeve-win.png > >> > > >> > Cut/Fold Envelope: > >> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-folded-win.png > >> > > >> > CD/DVD tall case cover: > >> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-dvd-case-win.png > >> > > >> > A4 poster: > >> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/freeyourself.png > >> > > >> > I have a few hours ahead of me before I button this iso image up, if you > >> > see some glaring problem I missed do please yell. > >> > >> The only possible problem I see is the text > >> > >> MS Windows > >> XP, Vista, Win 7 > >> (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation > >> > >> Should MS be spelt in full? > >> Microsoft and Windows are both registered trademarks. > > > > Just space requirements.. > > All the software packages I have seen which target Windows either omit > Microsoft or spell it out in full. > AFAIK "MS" is not an official abbreviation for Microsoft; they may not > be too happy. > > >> > >> Also, when I first saw this, I briefly thought that the (c) statement > >> applied to the content. > >> In fact I'm not sure what the (c) does apply to. > >> I suspect it should be removed. > > > > Hi Sebb, > > > > It should be a registered trademark glyph, there was a mistake earlier > > today and you may just need do a cache refresh. > > I can see the (R) now, however it is not appropriately used. > > AFAIK, the terms that are registered are > > Microsoft > Windows > Vista > > So the block should be: > > Microsoft (R) Windows (R) > XP, Vista (R), Win 7 > > (or is it called Windows 7?) > > It might be OK to omit the (R) after Vista. > > The following line is misleading and should be removed: > > (R) 2012 Microsoft Corporation > > Have a look at some other recent products that are designed > for/support Windows and see what they do.
Actually I had seen it used on a package, though not with the abbreviation and it doesn't make it right per se, anyway..I suppose So - acted on Alexandro's comments and yours, and as usual, listening does end up with a better result...updated the file here http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-label-win.png //drew
