On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 00:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 12 June 2012 22:34, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:48 -0400, drew wrote:
> >> I would like to propose that we treat the 13th of the month as our 1st
> >> Anniversary and would like to do the following for the occasion:
> >>
> > <snip>
> >
> >> I would like to release two CD iso images, Windows and Mac on the 13th
> >> of this month.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Alright - well, cutting it right down to the end on time here.
> >
> > I just want to be sure, as I'm not sure this is right branding wise - if
> > you anyone sees a problem with this let me know, I don't mind re-working
> > things. I also won't be offended if anyone says hold up..
> >
> > Here is the final cut on five items:
> >
> > A disk label:
> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-label-win.png
> >
> > Envelope/Sleeve cover:
> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-sleeve-win.png
> >
> > Cut/Fold Envelope:
> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-cd-folded-win.png
> >
> > CD/DVD tall case cover:
> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/AOO34-dvd-case-win.png
> >
> > A4 poster:
> > http://lo-portal.us/aoo/temp/freeyourself.png
> >
> > I have a few hours ahead of me before I button this iso image up, if you
> > see some glaring problem I missed do please yell.
> 
> The only possible problem I see is the text
> 
> MS Windows
> XP, Vista, Win 7
> (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation
> 
> Should MS be spelt in full?
> Microsoft and Windows are both registered trademarks.

Just space requirements..

> 
> Also, when I first saw this, I briefly thought that the (c) statement
> applied to the content.
> In fact I'm not sure what the (c) does apply to.
> I suspect it should be removed.

Hi Sebb,

It should be a registered trademark glyph, there was a mistake earlier
today and you may just need do a cache refresh.


> 
> It would be helpful to make clear that MS Windows is the host OS, and
> is not actually supplied.
> e.g.


> 
> Version for:
> 
> or
> 
> Designed for:
> 
> or
> 
> Supports:
> Microsoft (r) Windows (r)
> XP, Vista, Win 7 (or is it called Windows 7?)


hmm - I suppose, though Alexandro is saying 'too much'... tis the normal
way of things in other words ;)

so... I'll see about trying to do both things at the same time - if I
can tonight, add more white space and one that, actually it will be
better for both.


@Sebb - also if you don't mind me asking directly for you thought on
something. 

Rob correctly pointed out that this is really a re-mix of official
material, but not official itself - well, honestly looking at what I've
produced, not sure that is easily discerned. 

Does use of the brand like this, without any notice on any of those
pieces of who I am, who the actual publisher of the iso image is in
other words, cause any concerns in your mind?

Thanks much,

//drew

<snip>


Reply via email to