On 31/07/2012 drew wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
"Community members are also working on BSD, Solaris and OS/2 ports,
with plans to release these outside of Apache." ...
I think there is some logic to mentioning them in the
release announcement. But work that happens entirely outside of the
project, like portable applications versions, would not get a mention.
I would disagree, somewhat, in that personal preference would be to
include the 2 or 3 portable 'wrapper' distributors as this has seemed to
be of interest to quite a few folks in the past.
I can see the reasons to mention ports that are done by project members
but are released outside the project; but I agree with Drew that final
users probably have more interest in a portable version for Windows, so
(while still labeling them as unofficial and external to the project) it
would be good to list the portable version(s) available.
Regards,
Andrea.
