Hence my earlier proposal...
On 19/10/2015 09:18, David Moner wrote:
2015-10-16 3:22 GMT+02:00 Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com <mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>>:·It means that new implementers can use the corrected v1 revision and we don’t have to create a v2 for a relatively trivial problem; existing vendor implementations can remain unchanged or they can choose to update the units if they please. The MD5 changes, but all paths etc are identical. A minimal disruption approach, if you like – thanks Heath.And what happens if a new implementation sends data to an old implementation? Since the archetype identifier has not changed the receiver will use its own archetype to validate the received data, and if it includes the 'deg' unit it will just fail the validation. Breaking revisions are not only about changing the archetype structure, but also about generating a different set of possible instances.
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
