Hi, Multiple codes create the problem of deciding which one is ‘the truth’. One code needs be declared to be ‘the truth’.
But… ‘The truth’ depends on the context the code is used in. So how can one declare what the clinical/administrative/research context is? And… ‘subject’ has ‘associated data' Is the code used for defining the subject of associated data? Or is the code used to define the data provided itself? Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 15 Mar 2017, at 23:05, Sam Heard <sam.he...@oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > Hi All > > The idea was that the code_phrase was directly entered as part of choosing > the text from the terminology. > Anywhere where coding is done as a secondary process, the code mappings allow > multiple codes. > > I think this meets all the needs you have specified. Mappings allow each > terminology to be specified. > > It is likely in the future that EHRs will have multiple mappings for > different purposes and different eras of computing, allowing upgrading of > historical data. > > Cheers, Sam >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
